D&D

CASE STUDY 003

Client work

Home-Value Lead Campaign

49
Prequalified leads
$350.94
Total ad spend
$7.16
Blended cost per lead
2
Active campaigns

Residential real-estate client — identity withheld · Source: Meta Ads Manager reporting · 30-day reporting period

Context

The client needed a predictable flow of homeowner conversations without paying agency-scale management fees on an unproven offer.

Objective

Generate prequalified homeowner enquiries from a home-value offer, using a website funnel rather than a native lead form.

Offer

A home-value offer promoted to local homeowners, with the qualification questions carried by the website funnel.

Funnel

Ad → website landing page → submit application (qualification questions) → follow-up

Qualification: Application questions on the landing page; the client describes the resulting enquiries as prequalified.

Website funnel

Send traffic somewhere that qualifies.

39
Leads
$299.66
Spend
$7.68
Cost per lead
  1. Early

    13 leads

    $54.92 spend

    $4.22 CPL

  2. Mid

    28 leads

    $213.11 spend

    $7.61 CPL

  3. Latest

    39 leads

    $299.66 spend

    $7.68 CPL

The website funnel carried the qualification questions, so volume and quality could improve together rather than trading off.

$10/day at the referenced historical snapshot · 3,004 reach · 5,133 impressions

Video + photo test

Keep testing beside the winner.

10
Leads
$51.28
Spend
$5.13
Cost per lead
  1. Early

    4 leads

    $15.17 spend

    $3.79 CPL

  2. Latest

    10 leads

    $51.28 spend

    $5.13 CPL

A parallel creative test ran on a small budget the whole time, so the next winning format is always being found.

$10/day at the referenced historical snapshot

Combined result

39 website funnel + 10 video + photo test = 49 leads

$299.66 + $51.28 = $350.94

$350.94 ÷ 49 = $7.16 blended CPL

Campaign budgets shown represent specific historical snapshots and should not be interpreted as a universal recommended advertising budget.

Proof

SOURCE: META ADS MANAGER

Meta Ads Manager cards shared by the client showing Video + Photo test at 10 applications for $51.28 and Website only lead funnel at 39 applications for $299.66, captioned 30 days to 49 prequalified leads.

Client’s own post: 30 days → 49 prequalified leads

Posted publicly by the client. Handle, avatar and ad thumbnails redacted here; naming the client requires written authorization.

Full size ↗
Meta Ads Manager showing 28 website submit applications at $7.61 each, $213.11 spent, $10.00 daily budget, 3,004 reach and 5,133 impressions.

Lifetime reporting at the 28-application snapshot

Full size ↗
Campaign list showing Video + Photo test at 4 applications for $3.59 each and Website only lead funnel at 34 applications for $7.67 each.

Both campaigns side by side

Ad thumbnails blurred.

Full size ↗

Identifying account and lead information is always withheld, blurred, or redacted before reporting screenshots are published.

What was learned

  • Sending paid traffic to a qualifying website funnel produced more usable enquiries than chasing the cheapest possible form fill.
  • Running a small creative test alongside the winner kept a replacement ready before performance faded.

Next steps

  • Scale the website funnel while cost per application holds.
  • Promote the winning test creative into its own campaign.

Figures represent historical performance for the specific campaign, client, and reporting period identified. Past performance does not guarantee future performance.

CallBook a Call

Your privacy. Your choice.

We use necessary technologies to operate this website and optional analytics and advertising technologies to measure performance and improve our marketing.