CASE STUDY 003
Client workHome-Value Lead Campaign
- Prequalified leads
- $350.94
- Total ad spend
- Blended cost per lead
- 2
- Active campaigns
Residential real-estate client — identity withheld · Source: Meta Ads Manager reporting · 30-day reporting period
Context
The client needed a predictable flow of homeowner conversations without paying agency-scale management fees on an unproven offer.
Objective
Generate prequalified homeowner enquiries from a home-value offer, using a website funnel rather than a native lead form.
Offer
A home-value offer promoted to local homeowners, with the qualification questions carried by the website funnel.
Funnel
Ad → website landing page → submit application (qualification questions) → follow-up
Qualification: Application questions on the landing page; the client describes the resulting enquiries as prequalified.
Website funnel
Send traffic somewhere that qualifies.
- 39
- Leads
- $299.66
- Spend
- $7.68
- Cost per lead
Early
13 leads
$54.92 spend
$4.22 CPL
Mid
28 leads
$213.11 spend
$7.61 CPL
Latest
39 leads
$299.66 spend
$7.68 CPL
The website funnel carried the qualification questions, so volume and quality could improve together rather than trading off.
$10/day at the referenced historical snapshot · 3,004 reach · 5,133 impressions
Video + photo test
Keep testing beside the winner.
- 10
- Leads
- $51.28
- Spend
- $5.13
- Cost per lead
Early
4 leads
$15.17 spend
$3.79 CPL
Latest
10 leads
$51.28 spend
$5.13 CPL
A parallel creative test ran on a small budget the whole time, so the next winning format is always being found.
$10/day at the referenced historical snapshot
Combined result
39 website funnel + 10 video + photo test = 49 leads
$299.66 + $51.28 = $350.94
$350.94 ÷ 49 = $7.16 blended CPL
Campaign budgets shown represent specific historical snapshots and should not be interpreted as a universal recommended advertising budget.
Proof
SOURCE: META ADS MANAGER

Client’s own post: 30 days → 49 prequalified leads
Posted publicly by the client. Handle, avatar and ad thumbnails redacted here; naming the client requires written authorization.
Full size ↗
Lifetime reporting at the 28-application snapshot
Full size ↗
Both campaigns side by side
Ad thumbnails blurred.
Full size ↗Identifying account and lead information is always withheld, blurred, or redacted before reporting screenshots are published.
What was learned
- Sending paid traffic to a qualifying website funnel produced more usable enquiries than chasing the cheapest possible form fill.
- Running a small creative test alongside the winner kept a replacement ready before performance faded.
Next steps
- Scale the website funnel while cost per application holds.
- Promote the winning test creative into its own campaign.
Figures represent historical performance for the specific campaign, client, and reporting period identified. Past performance does not guarantee future performance.