Aesthetics Brand at Scale

1,689,226
Post engagements: 32,289
Link clicks: 16,173
Landing page views: $72,553.86
Reported spend

Cosmetic practice — identity withheld · Source: Meta Ads Manager reporting

Context

A recognised practice needed sustained reach and qualified traffic — at a budget level where wasted spend gets expensive quickly.

Objective

Hold a high-visibility aesthetics brand in front of its market at scale, across engagement and traffic objectives.

Funnel

Engagement and traffic campaigns → practice website

Reported delivery

Engagement
1,689,226
Post engagements
$0.00945 · Cost per engagement
$15,969.69 spent
Traffic
32,289
Link clicks
$0.96 · Cost per link click
$30,861.68 spent
Traffic
16,173
Landing page views
$1.59 · Cost per landing page view
$25,722.49 spent

These figures report advertising delivery — engagements, link clicks, and landing-page views — for the campaigns and reporting period shown. They are not a claim about leads, appointments, or revenue produced.

Proof

SOURCE: META ADS MANAGER

Meta Ads Manager showing 1,689,226 post engagements at $0.00945 each for $15,969.69, 32,289 link clicks at $0.96 each for $30,861.68, and 16,173 landing page views at $1.59 each for $25,722.49. — Three active campaigns with per-campaign spend
Account name, campaign name and profile image redacted. Naming the client requires written authorization.
Full size ↗

Identifying account and lead information is always withheld, blurred, or redacted before reporting screenshots are published.

What was learned

At this budget level, the job is disciplined allocation: engagement to hold attention, traffic to move it somewhere useful.

Build My Campaign All Work

Figures represent historical performance for the specific campaign, client, and reporting period identified. Past performance does not guarantee future performance.